The Hamas movement stated on Sunday that the Zionist enemy's "military" is intentionally intensifying its aggression in the Gaza Strip to derail understandings and prevent the completion of the ceasefire agreement's implementation.
In an official statement, Hamas declared that "the frantic, criminal bombardment of the Gaza Strip since Sunday morning—which resulted in the killing of more than 18 people and the erasing of entire families from the civil registry—represents a deliberate escalation pursued by the government of war criminal Netanyahu".
The movement added that this escalation aims "to disrupt the understandings reached with mediators, including the US administration, to complete the implementation of the ceasefire agreement".
Hamas called on the mediators and guarantors of the agreement to assume their responsibilities, condemn these Zionist crimes against the Palestinian people, and act immediately to pressure the occupation government to halt its aggression and compel it to abide by its commitments under the deal.
The movement emphasized that "these brutal acts, which amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity, demand official and legal action from the international community to hold occupation leaders accountable and to implement measures that protect our defenseless people, who continue to face the threat of genocide and displacement".
This development comes as the Zionist entity submitted objections to the so-called "Peace Board" regarding three specific clauses in the emerging agreement with Hamas, according to a report published earlier Sunday by the Zionist newspaper "Haaretz". The objections concern the fate of weapons to be collected from the movement, the roles of Qatar and Turkey in the verification mechanism, and the freedom of operation for the Zionist enemy's "military" in areas slated for transfer to the international stabilization force. The newspaper also noted that the Zionist entity conveyed its objections to "Peace Board" member and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, while the date for the agreement's entry into force remains unresolved.
